Table 6.CS Effect of demands-control among a subgroup close to the Whitehall sample MODELS SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS FOLLOWS Main(no P/status): model 7 in Table 26 excluding occupational status & physical demands CS only: as Main(no P/status) but in Civil Service subgroup STR CS only: as CS only, + demands*control interaction CS int: as Main(P/no status) + interaction of demands-control with Civil Service status CS-just C: as CS only but excluding demands CS-just D: as CS only but excluding control Main(no P/status) CS only STR CS only CS int CS-Just C CS-Just D --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Low control (base) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 [1.00,1.00] [1.00,1.00] [1.00,1.00] [1.00,1.00] [1.00,1.00] Moderate control 0.87** 0.47+ 1.35 0.87* 0.50 [0.78,0.97] [0.19,1.13] [0.55,3.31] [0.78,0.97] [0.20,1.25] High control 0.85* 0.43+ 1.03 0.84* 0.48+ [0.74,0.97] [0.18,1.02] [0.39,2.70] [0.73,0.97] [0.21,1.10] Low demands (base) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 [1.00,1.00] [1.00,1.00] [1.00,1.00] [1.00,1.00] [1.00,1.00] Moderate demands 1.01 0.26** 0.51+ 1.02 0.22*** [0.91,1.11] [0.10,0.63] [0.23,1.11] [0.92,1.14] [0.09,0.54] High demands 0.85* 0.10*** 0.19** 0.88+ 0.11*** [0.74,0.97] [0.04,0.25] [0.07,0.55] [0.76,1.01] [0.04,0.27] JEMoccS2 3.11+ [0.86,11.25] 0b.CSnew 1.00 [1.00,1.00] 1.CSnew 2.22* [1.19,4.16] 1b.JEMC2t#0b.CSnew 1.00 [1.00,1.00] 1b.JEMC2t#1o.CSnew 1.00 [1.00,1.00] 2o.JEMC2t#0b.CSnew 1.00 [1.00,1.00] 2.JEMC2t#1.CSnew 0.63+ [0.36,1.09] 3o.JEMC2t#0b.CSnew 1.00 [1.00,1.00] 3.JEMC2t#1.CSnew 0.75 [0.44,1.30] 1b.JEMD2t#0b.CSnew 1.00 [1.00,1.00] 1b.JEMD2t#1o.CSnew 1.00 [1.00,1.00] 2o.JEMD2t#0b.CSnew 1.00 [1.00,1.00] 2.JEMD2t#1.CSnew 0.42** [0.23,0.77] 3o.JEMD2t#0b.CSnew 1.00 [1.00,1.00] 3.JEMD2t#1.CSnew 0.32*** [0.17,0.60] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N 44382 1429 1925 44382 1429 1429 Num persons 10459 416 632 10459 416 416 Incidence 7.99 7.21 7.17 7.18 7.21 Parameters 94 73 76 99 71 71 _ *** Control: low vs. high *** Baseline (high control) 7.635 6.074 6.195 Effect of low control 0.929 2.984 2.625 SE 0.391 1.603 1.568 p 0.017 0.063 0.094 _ *** Demands: high vs. low *** Baseline (low demands) 8.241 14.648 14.846 Effect of high demands -0.902 -9.321 -9.318 SE 0.382 2.713 2.696 p 0.018 0.001 0.001 _ *** Control: low vs. high (low demands) *** Baseline (low-strain) 7.881 12.551 9.497 Effect of low control -0.130 SE 2.325 p 0.955 _ *** High-strain vs. Active *** Baseline (active) 4.035 Effect of high-strain 3.170 SE 1.370 p 0.021 _ *** High-strain vs. Low-strain *** Baseline (low-strain, as above) Effect of high-strain -0.006 -6.064 -2.292 SE 0.645 3.015 2.535 p 0.993 0.044 0.366 _ *** Control, linear *** Baseline (high control) Effect of low control SE p _ *** Demands, linear *** Baseline (low demands) Effect of high demands SE p _ *** High-strain vs. Active (linear) *** Baseline (active) Effect of high-strain SE p _ *** High-strain vs. Low-strain (linear) *** Baseline (low-strain) Effect of high-strain SE p _ *** Control: low vs. high (low dem, lin) *** Baseline (low-strain, as above) Effect of low control SE p _ *** Manager vs Non-manager *** Baseline (manager) Effect of being non-manager se p _ *** Manager vs Supervisor*** Baseline (manager, as above) Effect of being supervisor se p --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Exponentiated coefficients; 95% confidence intervals in brackets + p<0.10, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001